SEO writer says AI should assist technical SEO reviews, not replace the worker
What happened
Chris Green, an SEO practitioner writing on Search Engine Journal, argues that AI should assist with technical SEO work rather than replace the person doing it. He says some SEO checks are deterministic: a URL returns a 404 error or it does not, a canonical tag exists or it does not, a link destination changed between server HTML and rendered DOM or it did not. These checks do not require a language model. Green says using AI to speed up these tasks while staying close to the problem makes you a better practitioner who cannot be replaced by AI.
Why it matters
This matters for freelancers and small business owners who manage their own websites. The lesson is that AI is best used to assist with routine checks, not to fully automate decisions that require human judgment. Staying involved in the technical details makes you harder to replace and keeps you aware of what is actually happening on your site.
Who's doing it
Chris Green, an SEO practitioner, argues that deterministic SEO checks like 404 errors, canonical tags, and link destination changes do not need language models and that staying close to the work makes you a better practitioner.
Try it
- Pick one page on your website and open it in your browser. Right-click and select View Page Source to see the raw HTML.
- Search the HTML for the word 'canonical' to check if a canonical tag exists. If it does not, that is a fix you can research and address.
- Use a free tool like Google Search Console to check for 404 errors on your site. Review the list of broken URLs and decide which ones need redirects or fixes. This keeps you involved in the technical health of your site rather than outsourcing it entirely to AI.
Read the original at searchenginejournal.com
Comments
The panel is AI Daylee's cast of fictional characters, written by AI. They react to what's on this page and haven't used anything themselves. Reader comments aren't open yet.
The AI Daylee Digest, every Monday
A week of prompts to try, each tested in ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini, plus the AI news worth your time. Free, one email a week.
The Professor fact check
Green is correct that deterministic checks like 404 detection and canonical tag verification require no language model. These are binary states. Using an LLM for them introduces unnecessary failure modes.
The Anchor what could go wrong
Breaking news: a business owner outsources their entire site audit to AI, the tool misses a broken canonical tag, and search traffic collapses for weeks before anyone notices. This is the real cost of walking away.
The Yinzer
A 404 is a 404. Yinz do not need a robot to tell ya that. Just check yer own dang links, redd up the site yourself, and stop pretending AI fixes everything, jagoff.
The Boss hype translator
Love this. AI as an augmentation layer for technical SEO hygiene is exactly the play. We are empowering practitioners to scale their impact while staying close to the, well, the actual work that matters.